my observation - my thought - on civil society in Vietnam and children - 2017

2017 marks changes in the view of civil society in Vietnam to the extent that CSOs’ space is shrinking. CIVICUS’ tracking civic space shows that the state of civil society in Vietnam is closed (updated in Nov 2017). CIVICUS explains that “Independent associations are discouraged through significant legal and administrative barriers, and the state exerts power over the activities of civil society groups. Assemblies, including meetings, relating to sensitive topics are restricted through a requirement for prior authorisation, and through harassment and detention of organisers and participants. Those expressing critical opinions on sensitive topics are similarly targeted. Media outlets are heavily censored, and dissenting journalists and bloggers routinely arrested and imprisoned under vague criminal laws”[1]. It is noted that that space is not closed for the work of Vietnamese Civil Society Organizations (VCSOs) but also for international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) working in Vietnam while the draft decree on Decree on Sanction of Administrative Violations in the Organization of International Conferences and Workshops in Vietnam, the Operation of Foreign Non-Governmental Organizations in Vietnam, and Consular Certification and Legalization Activities was proposed by Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) which regulates the sanction for organizing international workshops, seminars[2].
The ideology of ruling party does not favour civil society and shows its hesitation towards civil society which is considered as ‘opposite actor’. Following Resolution 4 of the Communist Party in 2016 which mentioned “…inquiring for ‘the separations of three powers’; ‘civil society’; ‘pluralism and multi-party system’” was one of the signals of internal change of the Party’s member, term 3b of Article 7 of the Regulation 102-/TW (Nov 15 2017) imposes a sanction that the member of party is excluded from the Party in case of “…inquiring for ‘the separations of three powers’; ‘civil society’; ‘pluralism and multi-party system’”.
Regarding children’s rights and child protection, Vietnam launches National Action Plan on the implementation of SDGs, including target 16.2 which was translated into Vietnamese context as ‘Preventing and substantially reducing (not the term ‘ending’ in original SDGs) abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all forms of violence against and torture of children and adolescents” (p.69, National Action Plan). Ministry of Labour, Invalid and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is appointed as lead agency and 15 other agencies are in charge as coordinating agencies (including MOPS, MOJ, MOCST, MOET, MOFA, VOV, VTV, etc). Furthermore, Law on Children and Decree 56/2017 under the law come into effect and replace Law on Child care, education and protection (2004) and according Decree since July. With the emergent voice of media and VCSOs on different cases of child sexual abuse, in March, Designation 18 on enhancing solutions on preventing abuse and violence against children was issued. It requires the role and responsibilities of different agencies and actors including various ministries, mass organizations, VACR, the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Prosecutor. Besides, the law on legal aid (amendment), which was approved in 2017, entitled children (below the age of 16 according to the Law on Children) to receive full and free support. It shows the progression in child protection rather than the previous Law which only mentioned street children to receive free legal support.
At global level, the State has obligation of reporting the implementation of CRC, CAT and CRPD in 2017. However, according to the website of OHCHR, only State’s report on CAT was submitted, the others have not been submitted although due dates are over.

Comments